Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
Learn how to support this organization
Programs and results
Reports and documents
Download annual reports Download other documentsWhat we aim to solve
Access to knowledge is a fundamental right – a human and civil right that changes and improves the lives of individuals and entire communities. The Wikimedia Foundation has created the largest source of shared knowledge in human history: 60 million Wikipedia articles in more than 300 languages. Every month, volunteer editors expand Wikipedia by more than 200,000 new articles. Every month, people on our sites read more than 15 billion pages. Because we're a nonprofit that operates our projects in the public interest, every article and every pageview is free. Anyone with an Internet connection – no matter where they are – can utilize Wikipedia and get the information they want. Giving people unfettered access to the world's available knowledge is critical to having an informed, well-functioning society. Large segments of the world rely on Wikipedia's depth of knowledge. But we can do better. We can reach more people. We can impact more lives. That's the need we're continuing to address.
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Support and operate free knowledge websites, including Wikipedia
The Wikimedia Foundation operates eleven free educational websites that together bring free knowledge to millions of people every month. Our supported sites include Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons (the free multimedia repository), and Wikisource (a free collection of primary source materials). Edited by tens of thousands of people, these sites collectively generate billions of pageviews each month. The Wikimedia Foundation provides critical support for the Wikimedia sites and for the communities of people who read and contribute to the sites. Software and engineering improvements, server maintenance, and other crucial website support embody the work we do to ensure that Wikipedia is there night and day, whenever people need it. As a nonprofit, we rely on donors to support our work -- which donors do by giving to the Wikimedia Foundation's annual fund and by giving to the Wikimedia Endowment (https://wikimediaendowment.org/), which helps protect Wikipedia over the long term.
Where we work
-
Global
Awards
Web of the year 2007
Yahoo! Japan Web of the Year 2007, in the "Web of the Year" and "Information Resource on the Web" categories
Economist Innovation Awards 2008
The Economist, Business Process category
Quadriga 2008
Quadriga, a German award handed out every year to recognize four people or organizations that “try to create a better world through courage, dedication, and responsible action.”
Public Choice in the Category Knowlege, News & Information 2009
OnlineStar
Erasmus Prize 2015
Praemium Erasmianum Foundation
Princess of Asturias Award 2015
Princess of Asturias Foundation
Photos
Videos
Our results
How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.
Number of Wikipedia editors
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Support and operate free knowledge websites, including Wikipedia
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Editors who make at least one edit a month. This is a baseline # since it's higher than 250,000. See https://stats.wikimedia.org/#/all-projects and search for "editors" and "English" for example.
Number of new Wikimedia edits
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Support and operate free knowledge websites, including Wikipedia
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
This metric tells is how many edits our contributors make to Wikipedia and our other sites monthly. See https://stats.wikimedia.org/#/all-projects/contributing/edits/normal|bar|2-year|~total|monthly
Number of unique devices engaged with our sites
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Support and operate free knowledge websites, including Wikipedia
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
#s here are monthly. See http://blog.wikimedia.org/2016/03/30/unique-devices-dataset/ and https://stats.wikimedia.org/#/all-wikipedia-projects/reading/unique-devices/normal|line|2-year|(access-site)~m
Number of online pages our users view
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Support and operate free knowledge websites, including Wikipedia
Type of Metric
Input - describing resources we use
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
The Wikimedia Foundation's projects collectively generate more than 20 billion pageviews a month, as of February 2023. See https://stats.wikimedia.org.
Goals & Strategy
Learn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.
Charting impact
Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.
What is the organization aiming to accomplish?
"Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge." This was the statement that guided Wikipedia in its 2001 founding. More than 20 years later, this original vision continues to inspire the people who work at the Wikimedia Foundation. The Foundation was established in 2003, and Wikipedia has since grown from 200,000 articles in a handful of languages to more than 60 million articles across more than 300 languages. Every month, people around the world view Wikipedia more than 15 billion times.
Even with this success, there is much more to accomplish. Every year, the Wikimedia Foundation sets clearly defined project goals in our annual plan and evaluates our work over the year in an annual report. Our latest annual report can be found at https://annual.wikimedia.org/. And our latest annual plan is at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2022-2023.
The key focus areas of our 2022-2023 annual plan are:
1) Advance Knowledge Equity by bringing a stronger regional focus to our collective work.
2) Deepen our commitment to Knowledge as a Service by strengthening how we prioritize and allocate product and tech support to 740+ Wikimedia projects, starting with Wikimedia Commons and Wikidata.
3) Strengthen movement governance and health by supporting key priorities like the Movement Charter, the Universal Code of Conduct, and movement strategy implementation.
4) Improve the Foundation’s performance and effectiveness by improving our translation/interpretation support, lifting up more meaningful metrics to assess our impact, and designing shared services to support a truly global working environment.
What are the organization's key strategies for making this happen?
The Wikimedia Foundation is guided by detailed strategies that we've formulated with each of our departments and with our volunteer communities -- the thousands of writers, editors, photographers, and other contributors around the world who comprise such a major part of our sites' success. We outline our strategies for making our priorities happen at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2022-2023. Here are ways we’re implementing our priorities for the 2022-2023 fiscal year:
1) Advance Knowledge Equity by bringing a stronger regional focus to our collective work: One goal that the Wikimedia Foundation has set to advance knowledge equity is to further regionalize our support of a globalized movement. Recent calls for power-sharing and decentralization have led to programmatic structures (e.g., grantmaking) and other models that are more regionally-based, including the concept of hubs. This has been done with an equity lens to support more localized needs and differentiated contexts. How can we shift even more of the Foundation’s ways of working to support these objectives? As a starting point, we're organizing more of our work around 8 regions: East, Southeast Asia and Pacific (ESEAP); South Asia; Sub-Saharan Africa; Middle East and North Africa (MENA); Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) and Central Asia; Northern and Western Europe; Latin America and Caribbean; and North America (United States and Canada)
Starting in June 2022, Foundation teams began convening more intentionally around defining the impact that is possible for us to make together in different parts of the world. We’ll start with a historical lens on lessons learned from the past, and then launch a quarterly review of activities being done now by communities, individual volunteers, chapters, user groups, thematic organizations, partners organizations in the free knowledge ecosystem and beyond. We’ll then look at planned work by various teams at the Foundation to prioritize and align resources for focused results and more impactful partnerships. We’ll improve each quarter and share our learnings at https://diff.wikimedia.org/.
2) Deepen our Commitment to Knowledge as a Service, starting with Wikimedia Commons and Wikidata: With a growing list of 740+ Wikimedia projects across many languages, we must ask harder questions about how to prioritize the Foundation’s current support while we also commit to increasing our capabilities through reallocation of existing resources and/or securing new funding for our technology needs. An (imperfect, iterative) survey sought to understand how current Foundation resources were allocated to various Wikimedia projects. It confirmed that the majority of our resources remain committed to the multiple language versions of Wikipedia.
For more about our strategies -- including how we'll further Goals #3 and #4 -- go to https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2022-2023.
How we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To identify and remedy poor client service experiences, To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences, To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To identify where we are less inclusive or equitable across demographic groups, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We collect feedback from the people we serve at least annually, We take steps to get feedback from marginalized or under-represented people, We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We look for patterns in feedback based on demographics (e.g., race, age, gender, etc.), We look for patterns in feedback based on people’s interactions with us (e.g., site, frequency of service, etc.), We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response, We act on the feedback we receive, We tell the people who gave us feedback how we acted on their feedback
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
We don't have any major challenges to collecting feedback
Financials
Financial documents
Download audited financialsRevenue vs. expenses: breakdown
Liquidity in 2024 info
17.60
Months of cash in 2024 info
5.8
Fringe rate in 2024 info
22%
Funding sources info
Assets & liabilities info
Financial data
Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
Balance sheetFiscal Year: Jul 01 - Jun 30
The balance sheet gives a snapshot of the financial health of an organization at a particular point in time. An organization's total assets should generally exceed its total liabilities, or it cannot survive long, but the types of assets and liabilities must also be considered. For instance, an organization's current assets (cash, receivables, securities, etc.) should be sufficient to cover its current liabilities (payables, deferred revenue, current year loan, and note payments). Otherwise, the organization may face solvency problems. On the other hand, an organization whose cash and equivalents greatly exceed its current liabilities might not be putting its money to best use.
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Documents
Chief Executive Officer
Maryana Iskander
Maryana Iskander, who became CEO of the Wikimedia Foundation on Jan. 4, 2022, is a globally recognized social entrepreneur and an expert in building cross-sector partnerships that combine innovative technology with community-led solutions to close opportunity gaps. Maryana had previously served as CEO of Harambee Youth Employment Accelerator, a South African nonprofit social enterprise focused on building African solutions for the global challenge of youth unemployment. She also spent more than half a decade as the Chief Operating Officer of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, was the Advisor to the President of Rice University, an associate at global consulting firm McKinsey & Company, and a law clerk on the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. She holds a B.A. magna cum laude from Rice University, an M.Sc. from Oxford University as a Rhodes Scholar, and a J.D. from Yale Law School, where she received a Distinguished Alumna Award.
Number of employees
Source: IRS Form 990
Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
Officers, directors, trustees, and key employeesSOURCE: IRS Form 990
Compensation data
Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
Highest paid employeesSOURCE: IRS Form 990
Compensation data
Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
Board of directorsas of 6/9/2025
Board of directors data
Dariusz Jemielniak TRUSTEE
Dariusz Jemielniak
Esra'a Al Shafei TRUSTEE
Esra'a Al Shafei
Jimmy Wales
Jimmy Wales TRUSTEE (FOUNDER)
Kathy Collins
Lorenzo Losa TRUSTEE
Lorenzo Losa
Luis Bitencourt-Emilio
Luis Bitencourt-Emilio TRUSTEE
Michael Peel TRUSTEE (BEG 12/22)
Mike Peel
Nataliia Tymkiv
Nataliia Tymkiv CHAIR
Raju Narisetti
Raju Narisetti TRUSTEE
Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight
Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight TRUSTEE
Shani Evenstein Sigalov TRUSTEE
Shani Sigalov
Tanya Capuano TRUSTEE
Victoria Doronina TRUSTEE
Victoria Doronina
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? yes
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
No data