Carbon180
Carbon180 is a new breed of climate NGO on a mission to reverse two centuries of carbon emissions.
Learn how to support this organization
Programs and results
Reports and documents
Download annual reportsWhat we aim to solve
UN-backed science shows that carbon removal is essential to restoring a healthy climate—even alongside rapid emissions reductions. By 2050, we’ll need to remove up to 10 billion tons of CO₂ annually, about one-third of current global energy emissions. Carbon removal is a fast-growing but still nascent field. At this stage, it needs targeted research, regulation, investment, and oversight. That’s where Carbon180 comes in. We focus on policy because large-scale solutions demand the power of government—at the federal, state, and regional levels. We work to close research gaps, reduce costs, and unlock private capital. As an impartial, science-driven voice, we elevate community perspectives and advocate for policies that are both effective and equitable.
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Government Affairs
Carbon180's Government Affairs team builds relationships with key stakeholders to enable policy influence and collaboration. Carbon removal has always enjoyed bipartisan support, and the Government Affairs team works to strengthen and broaden this support by engaging with policymakers across the political spectrum including through the appropriations process as well as direct involvement with legislation to support tech, land, and ocean-based CDR.
Ocean Policy
The Ocean Policy team sets and oversees ocean CDR policy and related campaigns. Our inaugural Ocean Policy Director was hired in 2025, and is set to define and execute a forward-looking ocean policy strategy focused on: the defense and expansion of research and development funds at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA ) and the Department of Energy (DOE), the addition of ocean CDR into existing CDR legislation and initiatives, ground-up and opportunity-forward education and advocacy at the community to state level, and the building of an ocean CDR-specific coalition that spans industry, NGOs, and academia.
Tech Policy
The Tech Policy team sets and oversees technological CDR policy and related campaigns. This team influences the deployment of tech CDR through levers including government procurement, oversight of the Regional DAC Hubs program, and infrastructure using strategies and tactics including the appropriations process, coalition-building, narrative-building, and advocacy.
Land Policy
The Land Policy team sets and oversees land-based CDR policy and related campaigns. This team aims to bridge the gap between the on-the-ground realities of farmers and ranchers (producers) and policymakers who set land-based CDR policy to develop a transformative vision for the future of US land management inclusive of soil-based carbon removal that works for everyone.
Environmental Justice
With carbon removal, we have the chance to redress the injustices that led to this crisis in the first place. We weave environmental justice through every policy, project, and engagement to shape a carbon removal field that reroutes power to the most disenfranchised.
Science and Innovation
We work directly with scientists and startups, grounding our work in the latest research, partnering with entrepreneurs to incubate early ideas, and supporting innovation in emerging markets - all with the goal of creating tangible, lasting impact.
Where we work
-
United States
Our results
How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.
Dear Colleague letters
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Other - describing something else
Number of requests submitted
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Other - describing something else
Number of signatures on partner letters advocating for the importance of carbon removal across pathways
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Other - describing something else
Number of meetings or briefings held with policymakers or candidates
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Over 120 meetings in 2024 with policymakers across the House and Senate include Democrats, Republicans, and Independents to advocate for the importance of carbon removal across pathways.
Our Sustainable Development Goals
Learn more about Sustainable Development Goals.
Goals & Strategy
Learn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.
Charting impact
Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.
What is the organization aiming to accomplish?
Carbon180 designs and champions science-based, equitable policies that can remove carbon from the atmosphere at the gigaton scale. We envision a world free of legacy carbon emissions - a livable climate in which current and future generations can thrive.
What are the organization's key strategies for making this happen?
We're working to reverse two centuries of carbon emissions - the right way. This means being clear-eyed about what the growing carbon removal industry needs to thrive. At this stage, it needs research and development, regulatory frameworks, strategic investment, and oversight. Without these elements, we risk doing carbon removal "poorly" - resulting in a number of potential issues including, for example, that a ton of carbon claimed to have been removed might actually be less across different measurement standards; that carbon removal projects might marginalize and harm communities hosting and implementing them; that the duration of the carbon storage might be insufficient to reach climate goals; and that carbon removal might not scale quickly enough to keep the planet at a livable climate.
These very big issues require large-scale solutions, which is why we are focused on policy (primarily at the federal level, but also increasingly and intentionally at the regional and state levels as well). To work for the long-term, successful carbon removal policy requires the latest science and innovation, in addition to the perspectives of the communities who will be hosting and implementing these policies, which is why our work focuses on these three pillars:
Policy: The government is a powerful engine for change, we put it to work on carbon removal's biggest obstacles, helping policymakers fill in research gaps, drive down costs, and unlock private capital.
Environmental Justice (EJ): As carbon removal scales, we see the opportunity to not only scale it with the support of community stakeholders but to also create opportunity for communities themselves to benefit from projects environmentally and economically. We see this as not only the right thing to do, but also the key to building durable political coalitions with the most effective possible champions for future waves of carbon removal policies - constituents. In sum, everyone can win.
Science & Innovation: We work directly with scientists and startups, grounding our work in the latest research, partnering with entrepreneurs to incubate early ideas, and supporting innovation in emerging markets - all with the goal of creating tangible, lasting impact.
Along the way, we are also building the carbon removal field. We know that for carbon removal to succeed at scale, we need more people with diverse skills working on the complex and unprecedented set of issues that scaling carbon removal requires. We do this by working collaboratively with policymakers, community members, entrepreneurs, and scientists to bring big ideas to bear in this fast-moving space, including through our Entrepreneur-in-Residence program and our EJ regranting program. More people working on building an equitable, carbon-removing future means that we’ll get there faster.
What are the organization's capabilities for doing this?
Our team includes veterans in US government advocacy as well as climate scientists.
What have they accomplished so far and what's next?
All of our impact is measured as contribution not attribution (as we focus on policy change). In FY2022, Congress appropriated approximately $172.6 million for carbon removal.
Our advocacy in 2021 and 2022 included the following highlights:
Worked with key Senate offices and Finance Committee staff to advocate for important provisions within the 45Q credit for DAC; Successfully continued work with Congressional offices and committee staff to ensure carbon management (SCALE Act, Regional DAC Hubs, Class VI funding) provisions drafted by the Senate remain in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal; Began to work with partners to advise DOE on how to best implement provisions authorized through IIJA, particularly DAC hubs in coordination with other carbon management programs; Continued to refine our policy position on enhanced oil recovery (which ultimately resulted in a public position of no EOR in DAC hubs).
Last, we continue to publish a variety of tools & resources for thinking and learning about carbon removal. These include fact sheets, graphics, a newsletter, a blog, and reports. Search our tools & resources here: https://carbon180.org/search.
How we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences, To identify and remedy poor client service experiences, To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To identify where we are less inclusive or equitable across demographic groups, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve, To understand people’s needs and how we can help them achieve their goals,
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We act on the feedback we receive,
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
It is difficult to get the people we serve to respond to requests for feedback, Only some and occasional programs directly serve people (eg environmental justice regranting).
Financials
Financial documents
Download audited financialsRevenue vs. expenses: breakdown
Liquidity in 2023 info
24.62
Months of cash in 2023 info
21.1
Fringe rate in 2023 info
20%
Funding sources info
Assets & liabilities info
Financial data
Carbon180
Balance sheetFiscal Year: Jan 01 - Dec 31
The balance sheet gives a snapshot of the financial health of an organization at a particular point in time. An organization's total assets should generally exceed its total liabilities, or it cannot survive long, but the types of assets and liabilities must also be considered. For instance, an organization's current assets (cash, receivables, securities, etc.) should be sufficient to cover its current liabilities (payables, deferred revenue, current year loan, and note payments). Otherwise, the organization may face solvency problems. On the other hand, an organization whose cash and equivalents greatly exceed its current liabilities might not be putting its money to best use.
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Documents
Executive Director
Erin Burns
As executive director, Erin guides our team as we think big to scale equitable, just, and highly accountable carbon removal and build an organization focused on radical operational excellence. She previously worked on energy, labor, and coal worker transition issues in the Senate. She is originally from West Virginia and currently lives in DC with her family.
Number of employees
Source: IRS Form 990
Carbon180
Officers, directors, trustees, and key employeesSOURCE: IRS Form 990
Compensation data
Carbon180
Highest paid employeesSOURCE: IRS Form 990
Compensation data
Carbon180
Board of directorsas of 7/7/2025
Board of directors data
Erin Burns Executive Director
Carbon180
Keely Anson DIRECTOR
Marcius Extavour
Roxanne D. Brown CHAIR
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? no
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as: